Talk:USS Dennison (NCC-91367): Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 12:46, 19 October 2010

I really feel the previous picture was better - the integrated name and class looked good and there was no need for including the class name in the info below it. Besides it was a different picture to that from the Indefatigable class entry, which made things a bit more interesting. I would like to put the old picture back, if you don't mind. --George 10:30, 15 March 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 23:51, 19 July 2006 (edit) 216.217.111.70 (talk) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 12:46, 19 October 2010 (edit) (undo) 83.86.41.3 (talk) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Just put the NCC in Capital. -- Christopher Steinebach

	*I really feel the previous picture was better - the integrated name and class looked good and there was no need for including the class name in the info below it. Besides it was a different picture to that from the Indefatigable class entry, which made things a bit more interesting. I would like to put the old picture back, if you don't mind. --[[User:George\|George]] 10:30, 15 March 2006 (EST)		*I really feel the previous picture was better - the integrated name and class looked good and there was no need for including the class name in the info below it. Besides it was a different picture to that from the Indefatigable class entry, which made things a bit more interesting. I would like to put the old picture back, if you don't mind. --[[User:George\|George]] 10:30, 15 March 2006 (EST)